Right and left ventricular interactions, strain, and remodeling in repaired pulmonary stenosis patients with preserved right ventricular ejection fraction: A cardiac magnetic resonance study
Background Right ventricular dilation and dysfunction is a common long‐term complication in patients with repaired pulmonary stenosis (rPS). Additionally, abnormal right and left ventricular interactions have been reported in right‐sided heart defect after intervention, including in pulmonary stenos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2020-07, Vol.52 (1), p.129-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Right ventricular dilation and dysfunction is a common long‐term complication in patients with repaired pulmonary stenosis (rPS). Additionally, abnormal right and left ventricular interactions have been reported in right‐sided heart defect after intervention, including in pulmonary stenosis.
Purpose
To analyze ventricular strain, remodeling, and left and right ventricular interactions in rPS patients with preserved right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) compared with healthy children using cardiac magnetic resonance.
Study Type
A cross‐sectional study.
Population
In all, 34 rPS patients and 10 healthy children volunteers (controls).
Field Strength/Sequence
3.0T/2D balanced steady‐state free precession (2D b‐SSFP) cine, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and 2D phase contrast (2D‐PC).
Assessment
Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) fractions of the main pulmonary artery, biventricular volumes, masses, function, and cardiac strain.
Statistical Tests
Mann–Whitney U‐test, t‐test, Pearson correlation coefficients, Spearman's correlation coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients analysis were performed.
Results
For group analysis, the right ventricular (RV) global circumferential strain and radial strain were significantly increased in patients when compared with controls (−13.57 ± 2.69 vs. −5.91 ± 3.16, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27034 |