Comparison of the Nancy Index With Continuous Geboes Score: Histological Remission and Response in Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract Background and Aims Evidence has been supporting that histological activity of ulcerative colitis [UC] has relevance for the prediction of clinical outcomes in UC patients, such as clinical relapse. In this study, we aimed to compare two histological indexes—the continuous Geboes score [GS]...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2020-07, Vol.14 (7), p.1021-1025
Hauptverfasser: Magro, Fernando, Lopes, Joanne, Borralho, Paula, Dias, Cláudia Camila, Afonso, Joana, Ministro, Paula, Santiago, Mafalda, Geboes, Karel, Carneiro, Fátima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and Aims Evidence has been supporting that histological activity of ulcerative colitis [UC] has relevance for the prediction of clinical outcomes in UC patients, such as clinical relapse. In this study, we aimed to compare two histological indexes—the continuous Geboes score [GS] and the Nancy index [NI] —regarding their definitions of histological remission and response, and to determine the ability of faecal calprotectin [FC] levels to discriminate between these histological statuses according to the NI. Methods A large cohort of UC patients [N = 422] who were previously enrolled in other studies was analysed. Results GS and NI were shown to be strongly correlated [correlation coefficient: 0.882, p 1 (AUC 0.825 [95% CI 0.777–0.872]). The optimal FC cut-offs determined to predict the NI-defined histological remission and response were 91 μg/g and 106 μg/g, when maximising the negative predictive value [NPV]. Conclusions Due to the higher applicability of the NI, this study encourages the systematic use of this histological index to assess histological remission and response in UC patients.
ISSN:1873-9946
1876-4479
DOI:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa010