Evidence-based therapeutic dilemma in the management of uncomplicated amebic liver abscess: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background The role of metronidazole alone, percutaneous aspiration (PA), and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of uncomplicated amebic liver abscess (ALA) is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the available evidences with regard to treatment modali...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of gastroenterology 2019-12, Vol.38 (6), p.498-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The role of metronidazole alone, percutaneous aspiration (PA), and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of uncomplicated amebic liver abscess (ALA) is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the available evidences with regard to treatment modalities in such patients.
Methods
The database was searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 2019. All studies were assessed for risk of bias. The relevant data were pooled in a random or fixed-effect model to calculate the mean difference (MD) or relative risks.
Results
After the detailed screening, 570 patients from 10 RCTs comparing metronidazole alone with metronidazole + PA were included. Most studies had uncertain risk of biases. Days to resolution of abdominal pain (MD − 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 2.77, − 0.42,
I
2
= 89%) and tenderness (MD − 1.76, 95% CI − 2.93, − 0.58,
I
2
= 72%) were significantly shorter in the metronidazole + PA group. There was no significant difference in relation to the resolution of fever, abscess size, and hospital stay. The beneficial effects of PA were seen with medium-to-large (> 5 cm) ALA and not with small ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0254-8860 0975-0711 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12664-019-01004-y |