Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

The objectives of the study were to compare post-anesthesia care unit opioid use and pain scores, surgical and hospitalization times, and perioperative adverse events rates following robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) versus transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). This was a retrospective ana...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of robotic surgery 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.415-421
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, John N., Yang, Su-jau T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objectives of the study were to compare post-anesthesia care unit opioid use and pain scores, surgical and hospitalization times, and perioperative adverse events rates following robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) versus transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). This was a retrospective analysis of women 18 years and older who underwent either robotic sacrocolpopexy ( n  = 87) or transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension ( n  = 103) between January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 at Downey Medical Center by two surgeons. Data including nurses’ verbal pain scores and opioid use were abstracted from electronic medical records. Adverse events were classified using the Clavien–Dindo scale. Women in the robotic group were older (62 ± 8 years vs 58 ± 11 years, p  = 0.005), had higher rate of stage III or IV prolapse [49/87 (56%) vs 15/103 (15%), p 
ISSN:1863-2483
1863-2491
DOI:10.1007/s11701-019-01006-0