Association of slow flow with clinical factors in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with left main trunk-acute myocardial infarction

•Patients with left main trunk-acute myocardial infarction (LMT-AMI) were divided into the slow-flow group and the non-slow-flow group.•The vessel diameter by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was significantly longer in the slow flow group.•IVUS would be important to find high-risk features for slow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiology 2020-01, Vol.75 (1), p.53-59
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Kei, Sakakura, Kenichi, Akashi, Naoyuki, Watanabe, Yusuke, Seguchi, Masaru, Taniguchi, Yousuke, Wada, Hiroshi, Momomura, Shin-ichi, Fujita, Hideo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Patients with left main trunk-acute myocardial infarction (LMT-AMI) were divided into the slow-flow group and the non-slow-flow group.•The vessel diameter by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was significantly longer in the slow flow group.•IVUS would be important to find high-risk features for slow flow in LMT-AMI. Slow flow can be fatal in primary percutaneous coronary interventions for left main trunk (LMT)-acute myocardial infarction (AMI), however, risk factors for slow flow in LMT-AMI have not been well investigated. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may help to stratify the high-risk lesion for slow flow in LMT-AMI. A total of 51 LMT-AMI were included as the study population, and were divided into the slow-flow group (n=22) and the non-slow-flow group (n=29). Slow flow was defined as either transient or persistent Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2. The incidence of in-hospital death was higher in the slow-flow group (27.3%) than the non-slow-flow group (10.3%) without reaching statistical significance (p=0.116). Although the reference diameter measured by angiography was not different between the two groups, the vessel diameter measured by IVUS was significantly longer in the slow-flow group (5.22±0.69mm) than in the non-slow-flow group (4.50±0.47mm) (p
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.06.008