Image quality of hip MR arthrography with intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid versus gadolinium-based contrast agent in patients with femoroacetabular impingement

Objective To compare image quality of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip with intra-articular injection of high-viscosity hyaluronic acid (HA-MRA) versus Gd-based contrast agent (Gd-MRA) in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Materials and methods Design: single-centre, o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Skeletal radiology 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.937-944
Hauptverfasser: Randelli, Filippo, Nocerino, Elisabetta Antonia, Nicosia, Luca, Alì, Marco, Monti, Caterina Beatrice, Sardanelli, Francesco, Aliprandi, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare image quality of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip with intra-articular injection of high-viscosity hyaluronic acid (HA-MRA) versus Gd-based contrast agent (Gd-MRA) in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Materials and methods Design: single-centre, observational, retrospective, inter-individual, and cross-sectional. FAI patients who underwent HA-MRA (3 mL of high-viscosity HA plus 17 mL of saline) were compared with 37 age- and sex-matched FAI patients who underwent Gd-MRA (20 mL of 2 mmol/L solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine). Two independent blinded radiologists assessed image quality for all sequences (two-dimensional proton density, non-fat-sat axial, fat-sat coronal and sagittal; three-dimensional dual-echo steady state), using a 5-point Likert scale considering separately labrum, cartilage, round ligament, transverse ligament, and capsule. Pearson χ 2 and Cohen κ were used. Results The HA-MRA group was composed of 37 patients (23 males, 14 females; median age 38 years), the Gd-MRA group of 37 patients (21 males, 16 females; median age 38 years), without significant difference for age ( p  = 0.937) and sex ( p  = 0.636). Image quality did not differ between the two readers for any structure: labrum ( p  ≥ 0.340), cartilage ( p  ≥ 0.198), round ligament ( p  ≥ 0.255), transverse ligament ( p  ≥ 0.806), and capsule ( p  ≥ 0.314). Inter-reader agreement ( κ ) ranged from 0.785 to 1.000. Conclusions HA-MRA provided an image quality not significantly different from that of Gd-MRA. This may open the possibility of combining MRA and viscosupplementation in one single procedure.
ISSN:0364-2348
1432-2161
DOI:10.1007/s00256-019-03366-y