Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks

Background and Aims Serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) is a potential quality indicator for preventing colorectal cancer associated with the serrated pathway. Using clinically significant SDR (CSSDR) has been suggested based on clinically significant serrated polyp's ability to be colorectal c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2020-08, Vol.35 (8), p.1365-1371
Hauptverfasser: Park, Soo‐Kyung, Park, Sang Hyun, Yang, Hyo‐Joon, Jung, Yoon Suk, Park, Jung Ho, Sohn, Chong Il, Park, Dong Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims Serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) is a potential quality indicator for preventing colorectal cancer associated with the serrated pathway. Using clinically significant SDR (CSSDR) has been suggested based on clinically significant serrated polyp's ability to be colorectal cancer precursors. Correlations between CSSDR and simpler SDRs, other than proximal SDR, have not yet been studied. We aimed to investigate which simpler SDR indicator is most relevant to CSSDR or adenoma detection rate (ADR) and provide benchmark data. Methods We analyzed 26 627 colonoscopies performed by 30 endoscopists. Clinically significant serrated polyps were defined as any sessile serrated adenoma/polyp or traditional serrated adenoma, hyperplastic polyps ≥ 5 mm in the proximal colon, or hyperplastic polyps ≥ 10 mm anywhere in the colon. Correlation of CSSDR and ADR with other simple SDRs, SDR‐pathology (sessile serrated adenoma/polyp or traditional serrated adenoma), SDR‐size (≥ 10 mm), and SDR‐location (proximal location) was analyzed using Pearson's correlation test and Steiger's z‐test. Results The CSSDR was 1.7% to 13.2% (mean = 6.1%). The correlation coefficient of CSSDR/SDR‐size was 0.91 (P 
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/jgh.14977