Rapid On‐site Molecular Evaluation in thyroid cytopathology: A same‐day cytological and molecular diagnosis

Background Thyroid fine‐needle aspirates (FNAs) with undetermined morphology can be outsourced to centralized laboratories for comprehensive molecular profiling. When a local, rapid screening rules out easily detectable BRAF and NRAS mutations outsourcing is minimized, leading to cost savings. The f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2020-04, Vol.48 (4), p.300-307
Hauptverfasser: De Luca, Caterina, Sgariglia, Roberta, Nacchio, Mariantonia, Pisapia, Pasquale, Migliatico, Ilaria, Clery, Eduardo, Gragnano, Gianluca, Campione, Severo, Vigliar, Elena, Malapelle, Umberto, De Dominicis, Gianfranco, Bellevicine, Claudio, Troncone, Giancarlo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Thyroid fine‐needle aspirates (FNAs) with undetermined morphology can be outsourced to centralized laboratories for comprehensive molecular profiling. When a local, rapid screening rules out easily detectable BRAF and NRAS mutations outsourcing is minimized, leading to cost savings. The fully automated Idylla technology, that does not require trained staff, is an emerging option. However, Idylla platform has only been validated to process formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections. Here we investigate whether also the FNA needle rinse could be genotyped by the same cytopathologist who performs the FNA, a procedure that can be termed rapid on site molecular evaluation (ROME). Methods To validate this approach, the Idylla BRAF and NRAS Test was performed on the rinses from 25 simulated (bench‐top) FNAs, in a first part of the study. Genotyping data were compared with those obtained on matched histological FFPE blocks. The second part of the study was carried out on 25 prospectively collected routine FNAs to assess the performance of the Idylla BRAF and NRAS assay against a gold standard real time polymerase chain reaction method. Results Idylla NRAS‐BRAF Mutation Test was performed on needle rinse as well as histological FFPE blocks. A sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 100.0% were obtained comparing the Idylla NRAS‐BRAF Mutation Test on needle rinse to the reference method. Conclusions The FNA needle rinse can be directly genotyped. This obviates the need of cell block preparation, making possible a rapid combined morphological and molecular evaluation. Since DNA extraction is no longer necessary, the cytopathologist can perform ROME him/herself.
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/dc.24378