Modulation of Flight Muscle Recruitment and Wing Rotation Enables Hummingbirds to Mitigate Aerial Roll Perturbations

Both biological and artificial fliers must contend with aerial perturbations that are ubiquitous in the outdoor environment. Flapping fliers are generally least stable but also most maneuverable around the roll axis, yet our knowledge of roll control in biological fliers remains limited. Hummingbird...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current biology 2020-01, Vol.30 (2), p.187-195.e4
Hauptverfasser: Ravi, Sridhar, Noda, Ryusuke, Gagliardi, Susie, Kolomenskiy, Dmitry, Combes, Stacey, Liu, Hao, Biewener, Andrew A., Konow, Nicolai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Both biological and artificial fliers must contend with aerial perturbations that are ubiquitous in the outdoor environment. Flapping fliers are generally least stable but also most maneuverable around the roll axis, yet our knowledge of roll control in biological fliers remains limited. Hummingbirds are suitable models for linking aerodynamic perturbations to flight control strategies, as these small, powerful fliers are capable of remaining airborne even in adverse wind conditions. We challenged hummingbirds to fly within a steady, longitudinally (streamwise) oriented vortex that imposed a continuous roll perturbation, measured wing kinematics and neuromotor activation of the flight muscles with synchronized high-speed video and electromyography and used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to estimate the aerodynamic forces generated by observed wing motions. Hummingbirds responded to the perturbation with bilateral differences in activation of the main flight muscles while maintaining symmetry in most major aspects of wing motion, including stroke amplitude, stroke plane angle, and flapping frequency. Hummingbirds did display consistent bilateral differences in subtler wing kinematic traits, including wing rotation and elevation. CFD modeling revealed that asymmetric wing rotation was critical for attenuating the effects of the perturbation. The birds also augmented flight stabilization by adjusting body and tail posture to expose greater surface area to upwash than to the undesirable downwash. Our results provide insight into the remarkable capacity of hummingbirds to maintain flight control, as well as bio-inspiration for simple yet effective control strategies that could allow robotic fliers to contend with unfamiliar and challenging real-world aerial conditions. •Hummingbirds counter a challenging, continuous perturbation in their first attempt•Roll control uses bilaterally different muscle activation, posture, and tail fanning•Differential wing rotation and elevation generate oval versus figure 8 tip trajectories•Computational simulations show wing rotation to be critical to mitigate perturbation Ravi et al. use a steady longitudinal vortex to determine how fliers counter roll perturbations. Hummingbirds combine bilateral differences in wing elevation and rotation with subtle changes in posture and neuromotor modulation for an elegantly simple yet efficient countering of an unnatural and challenging perturbation.
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.025