Tinkering and overruling the computer decision support system: Working strategies of telephone triage nurses who assess the urgency of callers suspected of having an acute cardiac event

Aims and objectives To understand clinical reasoning and decision‐making of triage nurses during telephone conversations with callers suspected of having acute cardiac events, and support from a computer decision support system (CDSS) herewith. Background In telephone triage, nurses assess the urgency of callers’ conditions with clinical reasoning, often supported by CDSS. The use of CDSS may trigger interactional workability dilemmas. Design Qualitative study using principles of a grounded theory approach following COREQ criteria for qualitative research. Methods Audio‐stimulated recall interviews were conducted amongst twenty‐four telephone triage nurses at nine out‐of‐hours primary care centres (OHS‐PC). Results Telephone triage nurses use clinical reasoning elements for urgency assessment. Typically in telephone triage, they interpret the vocal—but not worded—elements in communication (paralanguage) such as tone of voice and shortness of breath and create a mental image to compensate for lack of visual information. We confirmed that interactional workability dilemmas occur. Congruence, established when the CDSS supports the triage nurses’ decision‐making, is essential for the CDSS’ value. If congruence is absent, triage nurses may apply four working strategies: (a) tinker to make CDSS final recommendation align with their own assessment, (b) overrule the CDSS recommendation, (c) comply with the CDSS recommendation or (d) transfer responsibility to the GP. Conclusion Triage nurses who assess urgency may experience absence of congruence between the CDSS and their decision‐making. Awareness of how triage nurses reason and make decisions about urgency and what aspects influence their working strategies can help in achieving optimal triage of callers suspected of acute cardiac events at OHS‐PC. Relevance to clinical practice Triage nurses’ reasoning and their working strategies are vital for outcome of triage decisions. Understanding these processes is essential for CDSS developers and OHS‐PC managers, who should value how triage nurses interact with the CDSS, while they have the benefit of callers in mind.