Denture use and osteoradionecrosis following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: A systematic review

Background It is strongly recommended to extract teeth with poor prognosis in head and neck cancer (HaNC) patients prior starting treatment with radiotherapy to avoid need for extraction post‐radiotherapy and prevent development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Dental extraction means that patients are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gerodontology 2020-06, Vol.37 (2), p.102-109
Hauptverfasser: Abed, Hassan, Burke, Mary, Scambler, Sasha, Scott, Suzanne E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background It is strongly recommended to extract teeth with poor prognosis in head and neck cancer (HaNC) patients prior starting treatment with radiotherapy to avoid need for extraction post‐radiotherapy and prevent development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Dental extraction means that patients are often left with insufficient teeth leading to psychological problems and reducing their quality of life post‐radiotherapy. Some clinicians do not advocate the use of dentures in HaNC patients claiming that dentures might lead to soft tissue irritation followed by ORN when constructed on irradiated jaws. Aims This systematic review aimed to investigate the existing evidence regarding the impact of denture use on the development of ORN in HaNC patients post‐radiotherapy. Methods This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Three database systems were used: Ovid Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO. PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. The https://ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to assess quality of studies being reviewed. Results Only three retrospective case‐control studies were included. Numbers of participants included in the three studies are limited with incomparable types of mucosal dentures. None of the studies described the method of measurement of the exposure (denture use) in a standard, validated and reliable way. Conclusion The three included studies suggested no link between denture use and development of ORN. However, very little evidence exists and the robustness of the studies is questionable. Well‐powered studies are needed.
ISSN:0734-0664
1741-2358
DOI:10.1111/ger.12456