Allopathic (MD) and Osteopathic (DO) Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Initial Certifying Examinations
Background Osteopathic physicians (DOs) represent over 30% of residents in allopathic (MD) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training programs. However, some have questioned the quality of osteopathic medical schoo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PM & R 2020-09, Vol.12 (9), p.899-903 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Osteopathic physicians (DOs) represent over 30% of residents in allopathic (MD) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training programs. However, some have questioned the quality of osteopathic medical school training and the graduates of osteopathic medical schools. The performance of osteopathic physicians in allopathic PM&R training programs has not been assessed.
Objective
To compare allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) physician performance on American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) initial certifying examinations.
Design
Retrospective cross‐sectional study.
Setting
Board‐eligible PM&R physicians.
Participants
MDs and DOs who completed an allopathic ACGME‐accredited PM&R residency training program.
Methods
MD and DO pass rates and mean scaled scores on the ABPMR initial certifying examinations were compared. MD versus DO degrees and training program 6 years aggregate board pass rates were independent variables.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
MD and DO pass rates and mean scaled scores on the ABPMR initial certifying examinations.
Results
Of the 2187 physicians who were first‐time ABPMR initial certifying examination takers, there were 1596 MDs (73%) and 591 DOs (27%). No statistically significant difference was found in pass rates between MDs and DOs on Part I (94.9% vs. 93.9%, P = .35) or Part II (87.8% vs. 88%, P = .83) of the ABPMR certifying examination. Analysis of mean scaled scores demonstrated higher MD scores on both Part I ( 526, SD = 31, vs. 516, SD = 67, P = .002) and Part II ( 6.73, SD = .83 vs. 6.62, SD = .77, P = .005), significant only in programs with a 90%‐100% pass rate. These differences, however, were of very small magnitude and likely not meaningful from a clinical or educational perspective.
Conclusion
This study did not find meaningful differences in performance on the ABPMR certifying examinations between MDs and DOs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1934-1482 1934-1563 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pmrj.12311 |