Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits Survival in High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis

Background To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUC patients from multiple urologic centers. Methods From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2020-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1297-1303
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Lingxiao, Ou, Zhenyu, Wang, Ruizhe, Zhang, Mengda, He, Wei, Zhang, Junjie, Zu, Xiongbing, Yi, Lu, Xu, Ran, Jiang, Shusuan, Qi, Lin, Wang, Long
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUC patients from multiple urologic centers. Methods From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UTUC patients who received chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC group) and 72 high-grade UTUC patients who underwent initial surgery (no-NAC group) were involved in a propensity score-based analysis. After propensity score-based (1:1) matching, 37 patients receiving NAC and 37 patients not receiving NAC were followed. Results The patients who received NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with a 3-year DFS rate of 78.4% and an OS rate of 86.5% versus a 3-year DFS rate of 51.4% and an OS rate of 62.2% for those treated with initial surgery ( P  = 0.018 and P  = 0.02, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the NAC group had a lower risk for mortality [DFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.62; P  = 0.003; OS HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.085–0.57; P  = 0.002]. The analysis of patient survival in matched subgroups showed that NAC was beneficial in terms of the 3-year DFS for the group with a cT of 3 or higher (DFS HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14–0.94; P  = 0.036) and the group that had tumor with hydronephrosis (DFS HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11–0.87; P  = 0.026). Conclusion The study showed that NAC may be considered as an effective addition to surgery for the treatment in high-grade UTUC patients.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-019-08128-7