Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits Survival in High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis
Background To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUC patients from multiple urologic centers. Methods From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2020-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1297-1303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUC patients from multiple urologic centers.
Methods
From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UTUC patients who received chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC group) and 72 high-grade UTUC patients who underwent initial surgery (no-NAC group) were involved in a propensity score-based analysis. After propensity score-based (1:1) matching, 37 patients receiving NAC and 37 patients not receiving NAC were followed.
Results
The patients who received NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with a 3-year DFS rate of 78.4% and an OS rate of 86.5% versus a 3-year DFS rate of 51.4% and an OS rate of 62.2% for those treated with initial surgery (
P
= 0.018 and
P
= 0.02, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the NAC group had a lower risk for mortality [DFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.62;
P
= 0.003; OS HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.085–0.57;
P
= 0.002]. The analysis of patient survival in matched subgroups showed that NAC was beneficial in terms of the 3-year DFS for the group with a cT of 3 or higher (DFS HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14–0.94;
P
= 0.036) and the group that had tumor with hydronephrosis (DFS HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11–0.87;
P
= 0.026).
Conclusion
The study showed that NAC may be considered as an effective addition to surgery for the treatment in high-grade UTUC patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-019-08128-7 |