Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons

Background No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for ‘loss of domain’ (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2020-04, Vol.44 (4), p.1070-1078
Hauptverfasser: Parker, Samuel G., Halligan, Steve, Liang, Mike K., Muysoms, Filip E., Adrales, Gina L., Boutall, Adam, de Beaux, Andrew C., Dietz, Ulrich A., Divino, Celia M., Hawn, Mary T., Heniford, Todd B., Hong, Joon P., Ibrahim, Nabeel, Itani, Kamal M. F., Jorgensen, Lars N., Montgomery, Agneta, Morales-Conde, Salvador, Renard, Yohann, Sanders, David L., Smart, Neil J., Torkington, Jared J., Windsor, Alastair C. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for ‘loss of domain’ (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdominal wall surgeons. Methods A Delphi study involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons was performed. Four written and two volumetric definitions of LOD were identified via systematic review. Panelists completed a questionnaire that suggested these definitions as standardized definitions of LOD. Consensus on a preferred term was pre-defined as achieved when selected by ≥80% of panelists. Terms scoring 
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05317-z