Outcomes of Direct Flow Medical vs Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Devices
This retrospective study was aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Direct Flow Medical (DFM) valve with the more established Sapien 3 (S3) valve in transfemoral TAVI in high-risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients. Between February 2014 and August 2016, 99 and 68 patients had the S3 and DFM val...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular translational research 2020-10, Vol.13 (5), p.790-795 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This retrospective study was aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Direct Flow Medical (DFM) valve with the more established Sapien 3 (S3) valve in transfemoral TAVI in high-risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients. Between February 2014 and August 2016, 99 and 68 patients had the S3 and DFM valves at our center, respectively. The device success rate was statistically similar among the S3 and DFM groups (
p
= 0.15). The overall post-procedural complication rate was similar between the two groups (
p
= 0.4). The procedural time was significantly shorter in the S3 group (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1937-5387 1937-5395 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12265-019-09948-4 |