CO2 activation through C–N, C–O and C–C bond formation
A comparative model for the chemisorption of CO2 was explored via three representative reaction pathways: carboxylation of cyclohexanone, carbonation of cyclohexanol, and carbamation of cyclohexylamine. The model substrates were activated using 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, an amidine sup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP 2020, Vol.22 (3), p.1306-1312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparative model for the chemisorption of CO2 was explored via three representative reaction pathways: carboxylation of cyclohexanone, carbonation of cyclohexanol, and carbamation of cyclohexylamine. The model substrates were activated using 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, an amidine superbase). For each of these reactions, the formation of the corresponding CO2 adducts was confirmed by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy measurements. It was demonstrated that CO2 fixation occurred through either an enol-CO2 adduct (i.e. carboxylation), proton shuttling process (i.e. carbonation), or self-activation mechanism (i.e. carbamation). Volumetric adsorption measurements indicated that cyclohexanol was superior in its uptake capacity (11.7 mmol CO2 g−1 sorbent) in comparison to cyclohexylamine (9.3 mmol CO2 g−1 sorbent) or cyclohexanone (8.5 mmol CO2 g−1 sorbent). As supported by density functional theory calculations, this trend was expected given the fact that the carbonation reaction proceeded through a more thermodynamically favorable reaction process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1463-9076 1463-9084 |
DOI: | 10.1039/c9cp05961j |