Manual vs automated 68 Ga-radiolabelling-A comparison of optimized processes
A critical factor for clinical practice is the production of Ga radiopharmaceuticals manufactured manually or through an automated procedure. Ga radiopharmaceuticals are often prepared manually, although this method can lead to an increased operator's radiation dose and potential variability wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals 2020-04, Vol.63 (4), p.162-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A critical factor for clinical practice is the production of
Ga radiopharmaceuticals manufactured manually or through an automated procedure.
Ga radiopharmaceuticals are often prepared manually, although this method can lead to an increased operator's radiation dose and potential variability within production. The present work compares
Ga-radiolabelling (PSMA-11; DOTA-TOC) utilizing a cassette module (GAIA; Elysia-Raytest; Germany) with a manual setup for routine clinical production with regard to process reliability and reproducibility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-4803 1099-1344 1099-1344 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jlcr.3821 |