Impact of preoperative liver dysfunction on outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices

Abstract OBJECTIVES We evaluated the impact of preoperative liver function on early and 1-year postoperative outcomes in patients supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and subsequent evolution of liver function markers. METHODS A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2020-05, Vol.57 (5), p.920-928
Hauptverfasser: Yalcin, Yunus C, Muslem, Rahatullah, Veen, Kevin M, Soliman, Osama I, Manintveld, Olivier C, Darwish Murad, Sarwa, Kilic, Ahmet, Constantinescu, Alina A, Brugts, Jasper J, Alkhunaizi, Fatimah, Birim, Ozcan, Tedford, Ryan J, Bogers, Ad J J C, Hsu, Steven, Caliskan, Kadir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract OBJECTIVES We evaluated the impact of preoperative liver function on early and 1-year postoperative outcomes in patients supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and subsequent evolution of liver function markers. METHODS A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted, including all patients undergoing continuous-flow LVAD implantation. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was used to define liver dysfunction. RESULTS Overall, 290 patients with an LVAD [78% HeartMate II, 15% HVAD and 7% HeartMate 3, mean age 55 (18), 76% men] were included. Over 40 000 measurements of liver function markers were collected over a 1-year period. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the 1-year mortality rate identified the optimal cut-off value of 12.6 for the MELD score. Therefore, the cohort was dichotomized into patients with an MELD score of less than or greater than 12.6. The early (90-day) survival rates in patients with and without liver dysfunction were 76% and 91% (P = 0.002) and 65% and 90% at 1 year, respectively (P 
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezz337