Combined hematologic parameters to optimize review criteria on XE‐5000

Introduction Forty‐one consensus review rules are presented to a large number of hematology laboratories worldwide, as suggested by the International Consensus Group for Hematology Review. Research on the review criteria has mainly focused on adjusting the threshold of each parameter to establish op...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2020-04, Vol.42 (2), p.152-161
Hauptverfasser: Fu, Liang, Guo, Xinyu, Li, Xueheng, Peng, Li, Luo, Huixian, Xu, Yao, Zeng, Fangyin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Forty‐one consensus review rules are presented to a large number of hematology laboratories worldwide, as suggested by the International Consensus Group for Hematology Review. Research on the review criteria has mainly focused on adjusting the threshold of each parameter to establish optimized criteria with better efficiency based on the consensus group criteria. This study aimed to optimize the review criteria by combining hematologic parameters on a Sysmex XE‐5000 hematology analyzer (XE‐5000). Material and methods A total of 662 nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) and 406 atypical lymphocyte cell (AL) flagged samples were used to establish hematologic parameters associated with NRBC and AL, respectively. Another set of 1423 optimization samples were used to validate the optimized criteria of NRBC and AL by combining associative hematologic parameters. The efficiency of each set of criteria was compared and optimized to obtain better efficiency, an acceptable slide review rate, and a low false‐negative rate. Results In the optimization NRBC set combining triple parameters, compared with the default setting (P 
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.13131