The QR-max index, a novel electrocardiographic index for the determination of left ventricular conduction delay and selection of cardiac resynchronization in patients with non-left bundle branch block

Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2020-08, Vol.58 (2), p.147-156
Hauptverfasser: Pastore, Gianni, Maines, Massimiliano, Marcantoni, Lina, Lanza, Daniela, Zanon, Francesco, Noventa, Franco, Corbucci, Giorgio, Rigatelli, Gianluca, Baracca, Enrico, Zuin, Marco, Picariello, Claudio, Carraro, Mauro, Conte, Luca, Roncon, Loris, Barold, S. Serge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be associated with LV conduction delay as judged by the invasive assessment of the Q-LV interval. We evaluated whether a novel ECG interval (QR-max index) correlated with the degree of LV conduction delay regardless of the type of non-LBBB ECG pattern, and could, therefore, predict CRT response. In 173 non-LBBB patients on CRT (92 NSCD, 81 RBBB), the QR-max index was measured as the maximum interval from QRS onset to R-wave offset in the limb leads. The correlation between QR-max index and Q-LV interval and the impact of the QR-max index on time to first heart failure hospitalization during 3-year follow-up were assessed. Q-LV correlated better with the QR-max index than with QRSd, particularly in the RBBB group ( r  = 0.91; p  
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-019-00671-3