Current density as routine parameter for description of ionic membrane current: is it always the best option?
The current density (J) is a parameter routinely used to characterize individual ionic membrane currents. Its evaluation is based on the presumption that the magnitude of whole-cell ionic membrane current (I) is directly proportional to the cell membrane capacitance (C), i.e. I positively and strong...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in biophysics and molecular biology 2020-11, Vol.157, p.24-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The current density (J) is a parameter routinely used to characterize individual ionic membrane currents. Its evaluation is based on the presumption that the magnitude of whole-cell ionic membrane current (I) is directly proportional to the cell membrane capacitance (C), i.e. I positively and strongly correlates with C and the regression line describing I–C relation intersects the y-axis close to the origin of coordinates. We aimed to prove the presumption in several examples and find whether the conversion of I to J could be always beneficial. I–C relation was analysed in several potassium currents, measured in rat atrial myocytes (in inward rectifier currents, IK1, and both the constitutively active and acetylcholine-induced components of acetylcholine-sensitive current, IK(Ach)CONST and IK(Ach)ACH), and in rat ventricular myocytes (transient outward current Ito). I–C correlation was estimated by the Pearson coefficient (r). A coefficient (k) was newly suggested describing deviation of the regression intercept from zero in currents with considerable r value. Based on mathematical simulations, I was satisfactorily proportional to C when r ≥ 0.6 and k ≤ 0.2 which was fulfilled in IK1 and IK(Ach)ACH (r = 0.84, k = 0.20, and r = 0.61, k = 0.06, respectively). I–C correlation was significantly positive, but weak in IK(Ach)CONST (r = 0.42), and virtually missing in Ito (r = 0.04). The impaired I–C proportionality in IK(Ach)CONST and Ito likely reflects heterogeneity of the channel expression. We conclude that the conversion of I to J should be avoided when I–C proportionality is absent. Otherwise, serious misinterpretation of data may arise. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0079-6107 1873-1732 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.11.011 |