Effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition on P-wave dispersion in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Background Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; sacubitril/valsartan combination) decrease morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Increased P‑wave duration and P‑wave dispersion (P d ) reflect prolongation of atrial conduction and correlate with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Herz 2021-04, Vol.46 (Suppl 1), p.69-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; sacubitril/valsartan combination) decrease morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Increased P‑wave duration and P‑wave dispersion (P
d
) reflect prolongation of atrial conduction and correlate with atrial fibrillation. Here, we aimed to assess the effects of switching from valsartan to ARNI treatment on the basis of P‑wave indices.
Methods
A total of 28 patients with HFrEF (mean age, 64.8 ± 10.6 years; 18 males, 78.6% ischemic etiology) were included. All patients had New York Heart Association functional class II–III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and had been switched from valsartan to ARNI treatment. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms from patients on valsartan treatment and electrocardiograms 1 month after ARNI treatment were analyzed; heart rate, maximum P‑wave duration (P
max
), minimum P‑wave duration (P
min
), and P
d
were calculated. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) scores and N‑terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values were recorded.
Results
The P
max
(135.6 ± 32.1 ms vs. 116.1 ± 14.1 ms,
p
= 0.041) and P
d
(33.6 ± 7.9 vs. 28.6 ± 5.3,
p
= 0.006) values were significantly reduced after ARNI treatment. Furthermore, ARNI treatment was associated with an improvement in MLWHFQ scores (31.2 ± 6.2 ms vs. 23.2 ± 7.0 ms,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0340-9937 1615-6692 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00059-019-04872-4 |