Understanding the professional satisfaction of hospital trainees in Australia
Context Ensuring that specialty trainees are professionally satisfied is not only important from the point of view of trainee well‐being, but is also critical if health systems are to retain doctors. Despite this, little systematic research in specialist trainees has identified policy‐amenable facto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2020-05, Vol.54 (5), p.419-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Context
Ensuring that specialty trainees are professionally satisfied is not only important from the point of view of trainee well‐being, but is also critical if health systems are to retain doctors. Despite this, little systematic research in specialist trainees has identified policy‐amenable factors correlated with professional satisfaction. This study examined factors associated with trainee professional satisfaction in a national Australian cohort.
Methods
This study used 2008‐2015 data from the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) survey, a national study of doctor demographics, characteristics and professional and personal satisfaction. Our study examined specialist trainees using a repeat cross‐sectional method pooling first responses across all waves. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess correlates with professional satisfaction.
Results
The three factors most strongly correlated with professional satisfaction were feeling well supported and supervised by consultants (odds ratio [OR] 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42‐2.77), having sufficient study time (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.40‐1.70) and self‐rated health status (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.53‐1.80). Those working >56 hours per week were significantly less professionally satisfied (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70‐0.84) compared with those working the median work hours (45‐50 hours per week). Those earning in the lower quintiles, those earlier in their training and those who had studied at overseas universities were also significantly less likely to be satisfied.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that good clinical supervision and support, appropriate working hours and supported study time directly impact trainee satisfaction, potentially affecting the quality of clinical care delivered by trainees. Furthermore, the needs of junior trainees, overseas graduates and those working >56 hours per week should be given particular consideration when developing well‐being and training programmes.
Training a strong workforce only helps if our trainees remain in the workforce. The authors explored factors associated with specialist trainee satisfaction and found 3 that stand out: Good clinical supervision, Appropriate working hours, and Supported study time. #traineewellbeing #medtwitter. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
DOI: | 10.1111/medu.14041 |