Mid-urethral sling in a day surgery setting: is it possible?
Introduction and hypothesis Several studies have shown that immediate catheter removal following pelvic surgery is associated with several advantages. The aim of this case–control study is to compare immediate versus delayed catheter removal following mid-urethral sling surgery, to determine if indw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2020-04, Vol.31 (4), p.817-821 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction and hypothesis
Several studies have shown that immediate catheter removal following pelvic surgery is associated with several advantages. The aim of this case–control study is to compare immediate versus delayed catheter removal following mid-urethral sling surgery, to determine if indwelling catheterisation is necessary after this procedure. The secondary outcomes were subjective and objective cure rate after at least a 1-year follow-up.
Methods
Cases were defined as all the women who underwent a TVT Abbrevo for urodynamically proven stress incontinence. In every case the Foley catheter was removed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure. A voided volume >200 ml with a post-void residual of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-019-04159-6 |