Corrosive attacks in the UK – Psychosocial perspectives and decontamination strategies

•Acid attacks involve the throwing of a corrosive with the aim to disfigure or kill.•Acids are preferable to physical assault as it does not require close contact.•Victims are at increased risk of psychological distress and mental health conditions.•Decontamination may be performed with chelating ag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2020-02, Vol.46 (1), p.213-218
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, C.J., Hodgkinson, E.L., Allison, K.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Acid attacks involve the throwing of a corrosive with the aim to disfigure or kill.•Acids are preferable to physical assault as it does not require close contact.•Victims are at increased risk of psychological distress and mental health conditions.•Decontamination may be performed with chelating agents such as Diphoterine. Acid attacks, or vitriolage, are defined as violent assaults involving the deliberate throwing of an acid or similarly corrosive substance with the intention to “maim, disfigure, torture or kill” [1]. The Acid Survivors Trust International suggest a prevalence of 1500 attacks reported worldwide per annum, although this is likely to be an underestimate by 40% [2]. The UK is thought to have one of the highest of rates of recorded corrosive attacks, with an increase from 228 attacks in 2012 to 601 in 2016. Most were reported by the London Metropolitan police force followed by Northumbria, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire, Greater Manchester and Humberside [[2]]. The chemical agents involved include acids, alkalis, oxidising and reducing agents, alkylating and chelating agents and solvents. They cause injury by producing a chemical interaction which can lead to extensive tissue destruction and extreme pain. Herein, we present a review on the changing epidemiology of corrosive attacks in the UK and currently employed management strategies.
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2019.06.003