Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction

Aim The optimal treatment approach for adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction remains unclear. The aim of this work was to compare outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) treatment for cancer of the rectosigmoid junction. Method This was a nationwide, retrosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2020-05, Vol.22 (5), p.513-520
Hauptverfasser: Salami, A. C., Obaid, T., Nweze, N. J., Deleon, M., Force, L., Gorgun, E., Wexner, S., Joshi, A. R. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim The optimal treatment approach for adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction remains unclear. The aim of this work was to compare outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) treatment for cancer of the rectosigmoid junction. Method This was a nationwide, retrospective cohort study (2004–2015) using hospital‐based cancer outcomes data (National Cancer Database). All patients who underwent resection with curative intent for locally advanced [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stages II and III] adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction were included. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 or over 75 years, Charlson–Deyo score > 2, AJCC Stages I and IV and unstaged tumours. Treatment with NCR was compared with treatment with AC, the primary outcome being overall survival. Other end‐points were resection margin status, the presence of lymphovascular invasion and postoperative length of stay. Results A total of 2828 patients were included in this study, of whom 1701 (59.7%) received NCR. NCR was more frequently utilized in patients who were black (10.3% vs 7.6%, P 
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/codi.14918