Same-day discharge of Gynecologic Oncology patients following ileostomy closure is feasible and safe

Gynecologic Oncology patients are traditionally admitted for 2–3 days following ileostomy closure. Our aim was to assess feasibility and safety of same-day discharge (SDD), by comparing 30-day clinical outcomes after SDD and standard admission. Retrospective study of patients who underwent ileostomy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2020-02, Vol.156 (2), p.446-450
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, J.M.V., Bouchard-Fortier, G., Covens, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gynecologic Oncology patients are traditionally admitted for 2–3 days following ileostomy closure. Our aim was to assess feasibility and safety of same-day discharge (SDD), by comparing 30-day clinical outcomes after SDD and standard admission. Retrospective study of patients who underwent ileostomy closure at two academic tertiary centres in Toronto, Canada, between January 2010 and October 2017. In total 117 patients underwent ileostomy closure: 23 had SDD and 94 were admitted for a median of 3 days. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, body mass index, comorbidities, primary malignancy, tumor stage, indication for ileostomy, previous radiation therapy, chemotherapy, interval between ileostomy formation and closure, and intraoperative complications. Median operative time was shorter (47 versus 60 min, p = 0.0001) and there was a longer median interval between last chemotherapy cycle to ileostomy closure (145 versus 106 days, p = 0.01) in the SDD group. SDD was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events (13% versus 24.5%, p= 0.24), as assessed by a composite outcome which included small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, clostridium difficile infection, sepsis, and thromboembolic events, when compared to standard admission. Moreover, SDD did not lead to more emergency room visits (17.4% versus 16%, p = 0.87) or readmissions within 30 days of surgery (17.4% versus 8.5%, p= 0.21). SDD is a safe alternative to routine hospitalization that has the potential to improve healthcare resource utilization, without increasing readmissions or emergency room visits. Careful patient selection is warranted. •Same-day discharge following ileostomy closure did not increase the risks of adverse event or readmissions.•Same-day discharge is a safe alternative to routine hospitalization after ileostomy closure.•Further prospective study is warranted to investigate patient-reported outcomes and cost-savings associated with SDD.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.014