Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance

In vitro drug screening is widely used in the development of new drugs, because they constitute a cost-effective approach to select compounds with more potential for therapy. They are also an attractive alternative to in vivo testing. However, most of these assays are done in two-dimensional culture...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials Science & Engineering C 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110264-110264, Article 110264
Hauptverfasser: Fontoura, Julia C., Viezzer, Christian, dos Santos, Fabiana G., Ligabue, Rosane A., Weinlich, Ricardo, Puga, Renato D., Antonow, Dyeison, Severino, Patricia, Bonorino, Cristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In vitro drug screening is widely used in the development of new drugs, because they constitute a cost-effective approach to select compounds with more potential for therapy. They are also an attractive alternative to in vivo testing. However, most of these assays are done in two-dimensional culture models, where cells are grown on a polystyrene or glass flat surface. In order to develop in vitro models that would more closely resemble physiological conditions, three-dimensional models have been developed. Here, we introduce two novel fully synthetic scaffolds produced using the polymer polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): a Solvent-Casting Particle-Leaching (SCPL) membrane; and an electrospun membrane, to be used for 3D cultures of B16 F10 murine melanoma cells and 4T1 murine breast cancer cells. A 2D cell culture system in regular tissue culture plates and a classical 3D model where cells are grown on a commercially available gel derived from Engelbreth-Holm Swarm (EHS) tumor were used for comparison with the synthetic scaffolds. Cells were also collected from in vivo tumors grown as grafts in syngeneic mice. Morphology, cell viability, response to chemotherapy and gene expression analysis were used to compare all systems. In the electrospun membrane model, cells were grown on nanometer-scale fibers and in the SCPL membrane, which provides a foam-like structure for cell growth, pore sizes varied. Cells grown on all 3D models were able to form aggregates and spheroids, allowing for increased cell-cell contact when compared with the 2D system. Cell morphology was also more similar between 3D systems and cells collected from the in vivo tumors. Cells grown in 3D models showed an increase in resistance to dacarbazine, and cisplatin. Gene expression analysis also revealed similarities among all 3D platforms. The similarities between the two synthetic systems to the classic EHS gel model highlight their potential application as cost effective substitutes in drug screening, in which fully synthetic models could represent a step towards higher reproducibility. We conclude PHB synthetic membranes offer a valuable alternative for 3D cultures. •3D grown cells have similar morphologies, resembling in vivo tumors.•EHS gel and electrospun membranes induce spheroid-like structures.•Solvent-Casting Particle Leaching had the largest pores and cell-ECM interactions.•Tumor cells grown on 3D models are more resistant to chemotherapy drugs.•3D models gene transcripts are more similar
ISSN:0928-4931
1873-0191
DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110264