Preoperative differentiation of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm from macrocystic serous cystic adenoma using radiomics: Preliminary findings and comparison with radiological model

•Three models were developed for the preoperative differentiation of MCN and MaSCA.•Combined model had better performance than radiological or radiomics model.•Radiomics helps in choosing therapy for patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasm. To develop a radiomics model in the preoperative different...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2020-01, Vol.122, p.108747-108747, Article 108747
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Huihui, Ma, Shuai, Guo, Xiaochao, Zhang, Xiaodong, Wang, Xiaoying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Three models were developed for the preoperative differentiation of MCN and MaSCA.•Combined model had better performance than radiological or radiomics model.•Radiomics helps in choosing therapy for patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasm. To develop a radiomics model in the preoperative differentiation of mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) and macrocystic serous cystadenoma (MaSCA) and to compare its diagnostic performance with conventional radiological model. 57 Patients (MCN = 31, MaSCA = 26) with preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans were retrospectively included in this study. A radiological model was constructed from radiological features evaluated by radiologists. A radiomics model was constructed with high-dimensional quantitative features extracted from manually segmented volume of interests (VOIs). A combined model was constructed using both radiomics features and radiological features. The diagnostic performance of three models were assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the calibration curves. The radiological model yielded an AUC of 0.775, sensitivity of 74.2 %, specificity of 80.8, and accuracy of 77.2 %. The radiomics model yielded an AUC of 0.989, sensitivity of 93.6 %, specificity of 96.2 %, and accuracy of 94.7 %. The combined model yielded an AUC of 0.994, sensitivity of 96.8 %, specificity of 100 %, and accuracy of 98.2 %. Both combined model and radiomics model showed higher AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy than radiological model (all P 
ISSN:0720-048X
1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108747