Accessing interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination dynamics
Both intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics have traditionally been investigated using relative phase patterns of in-phase ( ϕ = 0°) and/or anti-phase ( ϕ = 180°). Numerous investigations have demonstrated that coordination tasks that require other relative phase patterns (e.g., 90°...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2020, Vol.238 (1), p.17-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Both intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics have traditionally been investigated using relative phase patterns of in-phase (
ϕ
= 0°) and/or anti-phase (
ϕ
= 180°). Numerous investigations have demonstrated that coordination tasks that require other relative phase patterns (e.g., 90°) are difficult or near impossible to perform without extended practice. Recent findings, however, have demonstrated that an individual can produce a wide range of intrapersonal bimanual patterns within a few minutes of practice when provided integrated feedback. The present experiment was designed to directly compare intra- and interpersonal coordination performance and variability when provided Lissajous feedback or pacing metronome. Single participants (
N
= 12) and pairs of participants (
N
= 24, 12 pairs) were required to produce relative phase patterns between 0° and 180° in 30° increments using either pacing metronomes or Lissajous displays. The Lissajous displays involved a goal template and a cursor providing integrated feedback regarding the position of the two effectors. The results indicated both single and pairs of participants could effectively produce a large range of coordination patterns that typically act as repellers after only 6 min of practice when provided integrated feedback. However, single participants performed the in-phase coordination pattern more accurately and with less variability than paired participants, regardless of the feedback condition. These results suggest an advantage for intrapersonal coordination when performing in-phase coordination, possibly due to the stabilizing effect occurring via the neuro-muscular linkage between effectors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00221-019-05676-y |