Accessing interpersonal and intrapersonal coordination dynamics

Both intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics have traditionally been investigated using relative phase patterns of in-phase ( ϕ  = 0°) and/or anti-phase ( ϕ  = 180°). Numerous investigations have demonstrated that coordination tasks that require other relative phase patterns (e.g., 90°...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2020, Vol.238 (1), p.17-27
Hauptverfasser: Kovacs, Attila J., Wang, Yiyu, Kennedy, Deanna M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Both intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics have traditionally been investigated using relative phase patterns of in-phase ( ϕ  = 0°) and/or anti-phase ( ϕ  = 180°). Numerous investigations have demonstrated that coordination tasks that require other relative phase patterns (e.g., 90°) are difficult or near impossible to perform without extended practice. Recent findings, however, have demonstrated that an individual can produce a wide range of intrapersonal bimanual patterns within a few minutes of practice when provided integrated feedback. The present experiment was designed to directly compare intra- and interpersonal coordination performance and variability when provided Lissajous feedback or pacing metronome. Single participants ( N  = 12) and pairs of participants ( N  = 24, 12 pairs) were required to produce relative phase patterns between 0° and 180° in 30° increments using either pacing metronomes or Lissajous displays. The Lissajous displays involved a goal template and a cursor providing integrated feedback regarding the position of the two effectors. The results indicated both single and pairs of participants could effectively produce a large range of coordination patterns that typically act as repellers after only 6 min of practice when provided integrated feedback. However, single participants performed the in-phase coordination pattern more accurately and with less variability than paired participants, regardless of the feedback condition. These results suggest an advantage for intrapersonal coordination when performing in-phase coordination, possibly due to the stabilizing effect occurring via the neuro-muscular linkage between effectors.
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-019-05676-y