Perceptions of patient‐centred care among providers and patients in the orthopaedic department of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan

Objective This study examined the perspectives of 18 health care providers (nurses, consultant doctors, residents, radiologists, and physiotherapists) and 18 patients regarding best practices for patient‐centred care (PCC) in a free private hospital in Pakistan, studying the congruence between provi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2019-12, Vol.25 (6), p.1160-1168
Hauptverfasser: Rahman, Rahbel, Matthews, Elizabeth B., Ahmad, Alizeh, Rizvi, Syeda Mahnoor, Salama, Umme, Samad, Lubna, Khan, Mansoor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective This study examined the perspectives of 18 health care providers (nurses, consultant doctors, residents, radiologists, and physiotherapists) and 18 patients regarding best practices for patient‐centred care (PCC) in a free private hospital in Pakistan, studying the congruence between provider and patient perspectives. Methods Six focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted from January to March 2017: three with providers and three with patients. Focus group interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. A deductive approach was used to analyse the data using the key dimensions of Scholl's framework, which was then complemented with constant comparison analysis to explore variability and similarity among participants across the six focus groups. Results Findings indicated that providers and patients acknowledged maintaining a collaborative relationship with patients by using empathy. Patients and providers agreed that providers allocated time to counsel the patient and alleviated their fears. Family involvement was seen as a key indicator in decision making for patients. Some discrepancies were found between patient and provider perceptions of inhibitors to PCC, notably a lack of teamwork exhibited by providers and continuity of care offered postdischarge. Conclusions We recommend practices of PCC that are congruent with non‐Western settings where religion and family play a primary role in matters dealing with patients' illnesses. Our findings suggest the need for recurrent training to improve teamwork among providers; questioning the implicit agreement of patients who may be vulnerable to decision making of authoritarian figures in their family; and the inclusion of peer‐support workers or community health workers to offer aftercare support to patients in their home.
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/jep.13242