Quantifying economic impacts of climate change under nine future emission scenarios within CMIP6

[Display omitted] •To minimize the climate change impacts, quantitative assessments are needed.•Nine CMIP6 scenarios with latest emission and socio-economic projections are used.•The PAGE-ICE integrated assessment model provides reliable impact projections.•Regional inequalities lead to higher clima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2020-02, Vol.703, p.134950-134950, Article 134950
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Yating, Liu, Aobo, Cheng, Xiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •To minimize the climate change impacts, quantitative assessments are needed.•Nine CMIP6 scenarios with latest emission and socio-economic projections are used.•The PAGE-ICE integrated assessment model provides reliable impact projections.•Regional inequalities lead to higher climate change damages in poorer regions.•Aggressive mitigation strategies can greatly reduce the climate change impacts. The concept of “environmental determinism” suggests that climate conditions played a substantial role in shaping modern society. To minimize the social costs of future climate change and to promote economic development through identification of cost-effective adaptation strategies and mitigation policies, quantitative assessments are needed for obtaining a better understanding of the causal impacts of climate change on human society. In this work, we estimate the economic impacts of climate change during the 21st century under nine CMIP6 scenarios, using the PAGE-ICE integrated assessment model driven by the latest anthropogenic emission and socio-economic projections. Our results show that the largest climate change damages occur under the SSP3-7.0 scenario (involving regional rivalry and high anthropogenic emissions), followed by the SSP3-LowNTCF scenario (which considers significantly reduced NTCF emissions), and that climate change damage costs are expected to grow much faster than global GDP (reaching ~47% of global GDP in 2100). Gaps in adaptation resulting from regional inequalities would lead to higher climate change damages in poorer and warmer regions such as Africa and the Middle East. The outcomes obtained under the SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6 scenarios, in which the warming limit targets of 1.5 °C and 2 °C set forth in the Paris Agreement are considered, respectively, reveal that aggressive mitigation strategies pass a cost-benefit analysis and could significantly reduce the economic impacts of climate change.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134950