Real‐world experience with Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in the treatment of previously “difficult to treat” patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and 4
Background and Aim Grazoprevir/elbasvir (GZR/EBR) was approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infected patients with or without compensated liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess GZR/EBR regimen in the real‐world experience, particularly in previo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2020-07, Vol.35 (7), p.1238-1246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Aim
Grazoprevir/elbasvir (GZR/EBR) was approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infected patients with or without compensated liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess GZR/EBR regimen in the real‐world experience, particularly in previously “difficult‐to‐treat” patients with chronic kidney diseases, human immunodeficiency virus‐coinfected, cirrhotics, and treatment‐experienced.
Methods
The analysis included patients treated with GZR/EBR selected from 10 152 individuals from the EpiTer‐2 database, large national real‐world study evaluating antiviral treatment in 22 Polish hepatology centers between 2015 and 2018. Data were completed retrospectively and submitted online.
Results
A total of 1615 patients who started GZR/EBR therapy in 2017 and 2018 with a female predominance (54%) and median age of 54 years were analyzed. The majority were infected with GT1b (89%) and treatment naïve (81%). Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 19%, and 70% of patients had comorbidities, of which chronic renal disease was present in 7% and HIV‐coinfection in 4%. Overall, a sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved by 95% according to intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and 98% after exclusion of lost to follow up (modified ITT). No differences were found in cure rate between all included patients and subpopulations previously considered as difficult‐to‐treat. Majority of patients completed the treatment course as scheduled, adverse events were mostly mild and did not lead to therapy discontinuation.
Conclusions
GZR/EBR treatment carried‐out in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and 4 demonstrated good tolerability and an excellent SVR rate with no effectiveness reduction in so called difficult‐to‐treat populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.14936 |