A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures

To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties. S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2020-03, Vol.36 (3), p.708-713
Hauptverfasser: Taha, Mohy E., Schneider, Kerstin, Clarke, Elizabeth C., O’Briain, David E., Smith, Margaret M., Cunningham, Gregory, Cass, Benjamin, Young, Allan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord-like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties. Six suture materials (Ethibond, FiberWire, FiberTape, Orthocord, Ultrabraid, and Ultratape) underwent creep testing (n = 7, 60 N, 10 minutes) to determine specimen stiffness, initial elongation at 60 N of load, static creep (during 10 minutes of loading), and relaxed elongation (material recovery 3 minutes after removal of load). Furthermore, cyclic testing (n = 7, 10-45 N, 0.5 Hz, 500 cycles) was carried out to determine dynamic creep, peak-to-peak displacement, and relaxed elongation. Mechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine in 37°C phosphate-buffered saline solution. FiberTape showed the greatest stiffness (23.9 ± 3.2 N/mm, P < .001), the smallest amounts of static (0.38 ± 0.10 mm, P < .001) and dynamic (0.16 ± 0.09 mm, P = .003) creep, and the smallest peak-to-peak displacement (0.20 ± 0.02 mm, P < .001). FiberTape and FiberWire showed the smallest initial elongation (1.17 ± 0.17 mm and 1.63 ± 0.25 mm, respectively; P 
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.048