Predicting sudden cardiac death in a general population using an electrocardiographic risk score

ObjectiveWe investigated whether combining several ECG abnormalities would identify general population subjects with a high sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk.MethodsIn a sample of 6830 participants (mean age 51.2±13.9 years; 45.5% male) in the Mini-Finland Health Survey, a general population cohort re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2020-03, Vol.106 (6), p.427-433
Hauptverfasser: Holkeri, Arttu, Eranti, Antti, Haukilahti, M Anette E, Kerola, Tuomas, Kenttä, Tuomas V, Tikkanen, Jani T, Anttonen, Olli, Noponen, Kai, Seppänen, Tapio, Rissanen, Harri, Heliövaara, Markku, Knekt, Paul, Junttila, M Juhani, Huikuri, Heikki V, Aro, Aapo L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveWe investigated whether combining several ECG abnormalities would identify general population subjects with a high sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk.MethodsIn a sample of 6830 participants (mean age 51.2±13.9 years; 45.5% male) in the Mini-Finland Health Survey, a general population cohort representative of the Finnish adults aged ≥30 years conducted in 1978–1980, we examined their ECGs, following subjects for 24.3±10.4 years. We analysed the association between individual ECG abnormalities and 10-year SCD risk and developed a risk score using five ECG abnormalities independently associated with SCD risk: heart rate >80 beats per minute, PR duration >220 ms, QRS duration >110 ms, left ventricular hypertrophy and T-wave inversion. We validated the score using an external general population cohort of 10 617 subjects (mean age 44.0±8.5 years; 52.7% male).ResultsNo ECG abnormalities were present in 4563 subjects (66.8%), while 96 subjects (1.4%) had ≥3 ECG abnormalities. After adjusting for clinical factors, the SCD risk increased progressively with each additional ECG abnormality. Subjects with ≥3 ECG abnormalities had an HR of 10.23 (95% CI 5.29 to 19.80) for SCD compared with those without abnormalities. The risk score similarly predicted SCD risk in the validation cohort, in which subjects with ≥3 ECG abnormalities had HR 10.82 (95% CI 3.23 to 36.25) for SCD compared with those without abnormalities.ConclusionThe ECG risk score successfully identified general population subjects with a high SCD risk. Combining ECG risk markers may improve the risk stratification for SCD.
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315437