Whole‐Liver Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis for the Diagnosis and Staging of Liver Fibrosis

Background Conventional diffusion‐weighted imaging is limited in the quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis, and whole‐liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis might contribute to the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. Purpose To explore the value of whole‐liver ADC his...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2020-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1745-1754
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, You, Xu, Yong‐Sheng, Liu, Zhao, Liu, Hai‐Feng, Zhai, Ya‐Nan, Mao, Xiao‐Rong, Lei, Jun‐Qiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Conventional diffusion‐weighted imaging is limited in the quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis, and whole‐liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis might contribute to the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. Purpose To explore the value of whole‐liver ADC histogram parameters in the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. Study Type Retrospective. Population Twenty individuals with no liver disease and 86 patients with liver fibrosis, including 30 with chronic viral hepatitis, 29 with autoimmune hepatitis, and 27 with unexplained liver fibrosis patients. Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T/T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted, and diffusion‐weighted images. Assessment A region of interest (ROI) was drawn in each slice of the diffusion‐weighted images. Whole‐liver histogram parameters were obtained with dedicated software by accumulating all ROIs. The effectiveness of the parameters in differentiating stage 1 or greater (≥F1), stage 2 or greater (≥F2), and stage 3 or greater (≥F3) liver fibrosis was assessed. Statistical Tests Mann–Whitney U‐test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results Kurtosis, entropy, skewness, mode, and 90th and 75th percentiles exhibited significant differences among the pathological fibrosis stages (P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.26987