Resident involvement in minimally-invasive vs. open procedures

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic compared to open procedures. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2007–2012 was queried for open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2020-02, Vol.219 (2), p.289-294
Hauptverfasser: de Geus, Susanna W.L., Geary, Alaina D., Arinze, Nkiruka, Ng, Sing Chau, Carter, Cullen O., Sachs, Teviah E., Hall, Jason F., Hess, Donald T., Tseng, Jennifer F., Pernar, Luise I.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic compared to open procedures. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2007–2012 was queried for open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR), inguinal hernia repair (IHR), splenectomy, colectomy, or cholecystectomy (CCY). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. In total, 88,337 VHR, 20,586 IHR, 59,254 colectomies, 3301 splenectomies, and 95,900 CCY were identified. Resident involvement was predictive for major complication during open VHR (AOR, 1.29; p 
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.047