The metabolic clinical risk score as a new prognostic model for surgical decision‐making in patients with colorectal liver metastases
Background and Objectives Selection for surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains inaccurate. We evaluated if CRLM baseline metabolic characteristics, assessed by [18]F‐fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG‐PET/CT), could predict postope...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2020-02, Vol.121 (2), p.350-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Objectives
Selection for surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains inaccurate. We evaluated if CRLM baseline metabolic characteristics, assessed by [18]F‐fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG‐PET/CT), could predict postoperative outcomes.
Methods
In a retrospective series of patients undergoing surgery for CRLM, we defined two groups: the long‐term survival (LTS) and early relapse (ER) groups, where the postoperative recurrence‐free survivals were ≥5 years or 4.3, defining low‐ and high‐risk mCRS by scores of 0 to 2 and 3 to 6, respectively.
Results
From a series of 450 patients operated for CRLM (mean follow‐up of 58 months), we included for analysis 23 and 30 patients in the LTS and ER groups, respectively. Clinicopathologic parameters and CRS were similar in the LTS and ER groups. Median SUVmax/SUVmean(liver) ratios were higher in ER vs LTS patients (4.2 and 2.8, P = .008, respectively). mCRS was increased in ER patients (P = .024); 61% of LTS patients had low‐risk mCRS and 73% of the ER patients had high‐risk mCRS (P = .023).
Conclusions
18FDG‐PET/CT characteristics combined with traditional CRS may represent a new tool to improve selection for surgery in patients with CRLM. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.25763 |