Comparison of three kinematic gait event detection methods during overground and treadmill walking for individuals post stroke

Detecting gait events using ground reaction forces (i.e. kinetic detection) is the gold standard, but it is not always possible. Kinematic methods exist; however, accuracy of these methods in stroke survivors during treadmill and overground walking is unknown. Thus, this study compared the accuracy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2020-01, Vol.99, p.109481-109481, Article 109481
Hauptverfasser: French, Margaret A., Koller, Corey, Arch, Elisa S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Detecting gait events using ground reaction forces (i.e. kinetic detection) is the gold standard, but it is not always possible. Kinematic methods exist; however, accuracy of these methods in stroke survivors during treadmill and overground walking is unknown. Thus, this study compared the accuracy of three kinematic methods during overground and treadmill walking in stroke survivors. Heel strike and toe off were calculated bilaterally using three kinematic methods (horizontal sacral-heel distance, horizontal ankle-heel distance, and horizontal velocity) and a kinetic method for ten stroke survivors. We calculated true and absolute error for each kinematic method relative to the kinetic method to evaluate accuracy. Repeated-measures ANOVAs compared the absolute error between the different methods for each condition. There was a significant effect of method for all conditions except heel strike during treadmill walking. Post hoc tests showed ankle-heel distance detected heel strike with significantly less error than the other methods during overground walking (p 
ISSN:0021-9290
1873-2380
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109481