How do surgeons feel about the ‘Getting it Right First Time’ national audit? Results from a qualitative assessment

The implementation of the national ‘Getting It Right First Time’ was assessed by interviewing six surgeons involved at various levels in surgical site infection (SSI) audit. The positive impacts were to create new professional collaboration, improve stakeholder engagement, and increase the profile o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2020-03, Vol.104 (3), p.328-331
Hauptverfasser: Birgand, G., Troughton, R., Mariano, V., Hettiaratchy, S., Hopkins, S., Otter, J.A., Holmes, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The implementation of the national ‘Getting It Right First Time’ was assessed by interviewing six surgeons involved at various levels in surgical site infection (SSI) audit. The positive impacts were to create new professional collaboration, improve stakeholder engagement, and increase the profile of SSIs. One particular knowledge gap highlighted was that some participants had been unaware until that point of the criteria for diagnosing an SSI. The quality of data collected was felt to be poor due to methodological flaws. The audit was described as highly time-consuming and unsustainable if leaning on junior surgeons, without protected time and designated responsibility.
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.11.001