Total testosterone density predicts high tumor load and disease reclassification of prostate cancer: results in 144 low-risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy

Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between total testosterone density (TTD), defined as the ratio of serum TT to prostate volume (PV), and high tumor load (HTL) in low-risk prostate cancer (PCA) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods Tumor lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2019-12, Vol.51 (12), p.2169-2180
Hauptverfasser: Porcaro, Antonio B., Tafuri, Alessandro, Sebben, Marco, Processali, Tania, Pirozzi, Marco, Shakir, Aliasger, Amigoni, Nelia, Rizzetto, Riccardo, Brunelli, Matteo, Migliorini, Filippo, Siracusano, Salvatore, Artibani, Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between total testosterone density (TTD), defined as the ratio of serum TT to prostate volume (PV), and high tumor load (HTL) in low-risk prostate cancer (PCA) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods Tumor load was defined as the percentage of prostate volume invaded by cancer (PPI-PCA) in the surgical specimen. Pathologic features including tumor upgrading, upstaging or positive surgical margins in the specimen defined unfavorable disease (UD). PSA, TT, PSA density (PSAD), TTD, percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC), PV and body mass index (BMI). The association of factors with the risk UD and HTL was evaluated by statistical methods. Results The cohort included 144 consecutive low-risk PCA patients. Overall, 104 patients (72.2%) had at least one feature indicating UD. TTD was associated with BMI, TT, PSA, PV and PPI-PCA ≥ 20% defined as HTL. A higher PPI-PCA was associated with an increased risk of UD with a fair discriminant power (area under the curve, AUC = 0.775; p   20% were considered the study group versus patients with a PPI-PCA 
ISSN:0301-1623
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-019-02263-6