Comparison of two fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair techniques: single‐ vs three‐layer closure
ABSTRACT Objectives We reported previously on an exteriorized‐uterus fetoscopic repair for open neural tube defect (ONTD) using a single‐layer closure (SLC) technique. However, because SLC was associated with a high rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage at birth, we developed a three‐layer closu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2020-10, Vol.56 (4), p.532-540 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Objectives
We reported previously on an exteriorized‐uterus fetoscopic repair for open neural tube defect (ONTD) using a single‐layer closure (SLC) technique. However, because SLC was associated with a high rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage at birth, we developed a three‐layer closure (3LC) technique comprising a bovine collagen patch, a myofascial layer and a skin layer. The aims of this study were to compare SLC and 3LC in terms of intraoperative, postoperative and obstetric outcomes, as well as short‐term neonatal neurologic and non‐neurologic outcomes.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, from 32 consecutive SLC controls and 18 consecutive 3LC cases, that underwent exteriorized‐uterus two‐port fetoscopic repair of ONTD at our center, between April 2014 and December 2018. All patients satisfied the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) criteria. Obstetric, maternal, fetal and early neonatal outcomes were compared between the SLC and 3LC groups.
Results
Maternal demographics and mean gestational age (GA) at fetal surgery (25.0 ± 0.7 vs 25.0 ± 0.5 weeks' gestation; P = 0.96), and at delivery (36.5 ± 3.5 vs 37.6 ± 3.0 weeks; P = 0.14), were similar between the SLC and 3LC groups, respectively. The rate of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.21915 |