Effects of inspiratory muscle training in advanced multiple sclerosis
•Resisted inspiratory exercises improved inspiratory pressure in advanced multiple sclerosis.•Effects of threshold inspiratory exercise are specific to inspiratory muscles only.•Improvement in inspiratory strength was retained at 8 weeks post-training. Respiratory training using Threshold Inspirator...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multiple sclerosis and related disorders 2020-01, Vol.37, p.101492-101492, Article 101492 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Resisted inspiratory exercises improved inspiratory pressure in advanced multiple sclerosis.•Effects of threshold inspiratory exercise are specific to inspiratory muscles only.•Improvement in inspiratory strength was retained at 8 weeks post-training.
Respiratory training using Threshold Inspiratory Muscle Trainer (IMT) has not been examined adequately in multiple sclerosis (MS). The primary objective in this study of persons with advanced MS was to investigate the training effect of IMT. The secondary objective was to evaluate the retention of IMT benefits.
This study was a repeated measures within-subject design (before-after trial).. Participants were recruited from a long-term care facility specialized in progressive neurologic conditions. Thirty-six non-ambulatory persons with advanced MS volunteered. Inspiratory muscle exercise using the threshold IMT were performed daily for 10 weeks at 3 sets of 15 repetitions per day. Resistance was progressed weekly based on perceived rate of exertion and symptoms. Primary outcome measures were maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) that were measured at baseline, after 5 and 10 weeks of IMT exercises (training period), and at 4 and 8 weeks after the IMT training ended (retention). Linear mixed-effect regression models with time (i.e. weeks from baseline) as the fixed factor and participants as the random effect factor were applied separately to test each hypothesis. Effect size was calculated using partial eta square (η2p). Two-tailed significance level was p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-0348 2211-0356 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101492 |