Preoperative soft tissue laxity around knee was associated with less accurate alignment correction after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Purpose This study aimed to assess the effect of soft tissue correction due to knee joint laxity, which induces alignment error after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO). In addition, to verify whether postoperative soft tissue correction can be predicted from preoperative radiographic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.3022-3030
Hauptverfasser: Takagawa, Shu, Kobayashi, Naomi, Yukizawa, Yohei, Oishi, Takayuki, Tsuji, Masaki, Inaba, Yutaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aimed to assess the effect of soft tissue correction due to knee joint laxity, which induces alignment error after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO). In addition, to verify whether postoperative soft tissue correction can be predicted from preoperative radiographic parameters. Methods A retrospective evaluation of data from patients treated by CWHTO in 2016–2019 was performed. Standing full-length anteroposterior radiograph measurement was performed pre- and post-surgery, and short anteroposterior radiographs of the knee under maximal manual varus and valgus stress were taken preoperatively. The weight-bearing line, hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured, in addition to JLCA under varus or valgus conditions. Soft tissue correction was defined as ΔHKA minus ΔMPTA. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate preoperative factors that could influence soft tissue correction. Results Data from 49 knees were included in the analysis. The mean soft tissue correction was 3.2°, which indicates an over-correction. Multiple regression analysis revealed that JLCA ( β  = 0.642; p  
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-019-05762-2