Photogrammetric Outcomes of Primary Nasal Correction in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients: Early Childhood Results From a Single Surgeon's Experience

BACKGROUNDConcerns of nonlasting results and potential nasal growth damage precluded cleft nasal correction at the time of initial cleft lip repair. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip. METHODSA retrospective review of pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2020-01, Vol.84 (1), p.53-61
Hauptverfasser: Nunez-Villaveiran, Teresa, Fahradyan, Vahe, McNinch, Neil L., Valentine, Ashley, Larson, Heather, Murthy, Ananth S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDConcerns of nonlasting results and potential nasal growth damage precluded cleft nasal correction at the time of initial cleft lip repair. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip. METHODSA retrospective review of patients with complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip who underwent primary cleft nasal correction from 2010 to 2017 by the same surgeon was performed. The cleft-to-noncleft nostril height, width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nasal sill height, and nostril area ratios, as well as inner nostril height-to-width ratios were determined from standard basilar view photographs taken in different time points (T1, 36 months after surgery). A 5-point visual analog scale (1 = worst, 5 = best) was used to assess each patientʼs nose appearance. RESULTSSeventy-two patients were identified (66.7% male, 51.3% with a complete cleft lip). Average visual analog scale scores T1–T4 were 3.88 ± 0.85, 3.72 ± 0.93, 3.54 ± 0.99, and 3.40 ± 0.71, respectively. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.61 to 0.94. A significant decrease [mean difference (SD)] was found for cleft-to-noncleft nostril width ratio [0.15 (0.18)] from T1 to T2, and an increase for one-fourth medial height ratio [−0.09 (0.07)] and for inner nostril height-to-width ratio in the noncleft side [−0.23 (0.25)] from T1 to T3. Thirteen patients required secondary surgical revision. CONCLUSIONBased on photogrammetry, primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip achieved acceptable and stable outcomes during early childhood.
ISSN:0148-7043
1536-3708
DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002039