Underuse of Clinical Decision Rules and d-Dimer in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Survey of the Veterans Administration Healthcare System
The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenge. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected PE has become the primary imaging modality, but concerns regarding overutilization, overdiagnosis, radiation, and costs have led to algorithms that combine a clinical decision rule (CDR) and h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2020-03, Vol.17 (3), p.405-411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenge. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected PE has become the primary imaging modality, but concerns regarding overutilization, overdiagnosis, radiation, and costs have led to algorithms that combine a clinical decision rule (CDR) and highly sensitive d-dimer to identify patients in whom PE can be safely excluded without further studies. This has been identified as a top five Choosing Wisely recommendation in pulmonary medicine, but adherence is modest at best and actual utilization is unknown. Therefore, a survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of this approach in the Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system.
A web-based questionnaire survey (SurveyGizmo.com) was developed and validated to query the utilization of CDR ± d-dimer in suspected PE. Key stakeholders identified from national VA mailing lists of radiology, pulmonary, and emergency medicine chiefs were sent an email describing the survey and provided a link for response. This study was reviewed and approved by our local institutional review board and accessing the link represented consent for participation. No personally identifiable data were collected and a drawing for a gift card was provided as an incentive.
There were a total of 159 responses, with 120 fully completed surveys for analysis. The majority of respondents were chiefs (63%) with 11+ years of experience (80%), from hospitals with house staff (86%) and an emergency department (97%). Respondents were from emergency medicine (31%), pulmonary (27%), radiology (26%), and other departments (9%). The overwhelming majority of respondents (85%) did not require results of a CDR ± d-dimer before ordering a CTPA. Only 6.7% required a CDR + d-dimer, with others requiring either only a CDR (5.8%) or d-dimer (2.5%). The most common CDR was the Wells score, with only one using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria. Nine of 18 (50%) regional Veterans Integrated Service Networks reported at least one site requiring a CDR before CTPA. An average of 9.6 CTPAs were estimated to be performed per week. Sorted by CDR and d-dimer use, 8 (CDR + d-dimer), 6.9 (CDR only), 8 (d-dimer only), 10.1 (no requirements) CTPA studies were performed weekly. The average CTPA yield for PE was estimated at 11.9% (CDR + d-dimer), 8% (CDR only), 2.5% (d-dimer only), and 7.6% (no requirements).
The vast majority of hospitals within the VA system do not use a CDR ± d-dimer in the evaluation of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.10.001 |