AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: lacking discriminating capacity or requirement of high methodological quality?
The authors investigated the inter-rater reliability and construct validity and found results comparable to our recently published article [1], which focused on systematic reviews (SRs) of therapy of adult depression. [...]the presented results by Leclercq et al. supported our findings. PRISMA was c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2020-03, Vol.119, p.142-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The authors investigated the inter-rater reliability and construct validity and found results comparable to our recently published article [1], which focused on systematic reviews (SRs) of therapy of adult depression. [...]the presented results by Leclercq et al. supported our findings. PRISMA was created for authors of SR whereas AMSTAR 2 is for the critical appraisal of SR. [...]these constructs may overlap, resulting in a potential association between the instruments as better reporting quality allows for a more thorough critical appraisal. [...]to the sample of the Leclercq study (195 [95%] of 206 meta-analyses were categorized as “critically low,” eight [4%] as “low,” two [1%] as “moderate,” and one [ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.006 |