AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: lacking discriminating capacity or requirement of high methodological quality?

The authors investigated the inter-rater reliability and construct validity and found results comparable to our recently published article [1], which focused on systematic reviews (SRs) of therapy of adult depression. [...]the presented results by Leclercq et al. supported our findings. PRISMA was c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2020-03, Vol.119, p.142-144
Hauptverfasser: Lorenz, Robert C., Matthias, Katja, Pieper, Dawid, Wegewitz, Uta, Morche, Johannes, Nocon, Marc, Rissling, Olesja, Schirm, Jacqueline, Freitag, Simone, Jacobs, Anja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The authors investigated the inter-rater reliability and construct validity and found results comparable to our recently published article [1], which focused on systematic reviews (SRs) of therapy of adult depression. [...]the presented results by Leclercq et al. supported our findings. PRISMA was created for authors of SR whereas AMSTAR 2 is for the critical appraisal of SR. [...]these constructs may overlap, resulting in a potential association between the instruments as better reporting quality allows for a more thorough critical appraisal. [...]to the sample of the Leclercq study (195 [95%] of 206 meta-analyses were categorized as “critically low,” eight [4%] as “low,” two [1%] as “moderate,” and one [
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.006