The impact of infection control cost reimbursement policy on central line–associated bloodstream infections

•Korean National Health Insurance has begun reimbursing infection control costs.•This policy strengthens the infection control team in a supported hospital.•The compliance with infection prevention bundles improve in a supported hospital.•Central line–associated bloodstream infection decreased in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2020-05, Vol.48 (5), p.560-565
Hauptverfasser: Park, Ji Young, Kwon, Ki Tae, Lee, Won Kee, Kim, Hye In, Kim, Min Jung, Song, Do Young, Yu, Mi Hyae, Park, Hyun Ju, Lee, Kyeong Hee, Chae, Hyun Ju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Korean National Health Insurance has begun reimbursing infection control costs.•This policy strengthens the infection control team in a supported hospital.•The compliance with infection prevention bundles improve in a supported hospital.•Central line–associated bloodstream infection decreased in a supported hospital. In September 2016, the Korean National Health Insurance Service began reimbursing infection control (IC) costs on the condition that a certain number of doctors and full-time nurses for IC be allocated to supported hospitals. We analyzed the impact of the IC cost reimbursement policy on central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). A before-and-after study that analyzed the CLABSI rate trends between preintervention (January 2016 to February 2017) and intervention (March to December 2017) periods using autoregression time series analysis was performed in intensive care units (ICUs) at a 750-bed, secondary care hospital in Daegu, Republic of Korea. The enhanced IC team visited ICUs daily, monitored the implementation of CLABSI prevention bundles, and educated all personnel involved in catheter insertion and maintenance from March 2017. Autoregressive analysis revealed that the CLABSI rates per month in the preintervention and intervention periods were −0.256 (95% confidence interval, −0.613 to 0.101; P = .15) and −0.602 (95% confidence interval, −0.972 to −0.232; P = .008), respectively. The rates of compliance with maximal barrier precautions significantly improved from the preintervention (36.2%) to the intervention (77.9%) period (χ² test, P < .001). The IC cost reimbursement policy accelerated the decline in CLABSI rates significantly in monitored ICUs. A nationwide study to evaluate the effectiveness of the IC cost reimbursement policy for various health care–associated infections is warranted.
ISSN:0196-6553
1527-3296
DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2019.09.002