The upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation

Key points Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) is expressed by the temporal pattern of cerebral blood flow (CBF) recovery following a sudden change in arterial blood pressure (BP). Transfer function analysis of BP as input and CBF velocity as output can express dynamic CA through its amplitude (or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of physiology 2019-12, Vol.597 (24), p.5821-5833
Hauptverfasser: Panerai, Ronney B., Robinson, Thompson G., Minhas, Jatinder S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Key points Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) is expressed by the temporal pattern of cerebral blood flow (CBF) recovery following a sudden change in arterial blood pressure (BP). Transfer function analysis of BP as input and CBF velocity as output can express dynamic CA through its amplitude (or gain) and phase frequency responses. The upper frequency limit (FupLim) at which dynamic CA can operate is of considerable physiological interest and can also provide additional information about worsening CA due to disease processes. In healthy subjects FupLim was strongly dependent on arterial PCO2 changes induced by four different breathing manoeuvres. The considerable intersubject variability in FupLim suggests that fixed frequency bands should not be adopted for averaging values of gain and phase in studies of dynamic CA. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) can be expressed in the frequency domain by the amplitude and phase frequency responses calculated by transfer function analysis of arterial blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV). We studied the effects of arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) on the upper frequency limit (FupLim) of these responses and its intersubject variability. Twenty‐four healthy subjects (11 female, age 36.0 ± 13.4 years) were recruited. Recordings of CBFV (transcranial Doppler ultrasound), BP (Finometer) and end‐tidal CO2 (PETCO2, capnography) were performed during 5 min at rest (normocapnia) and during four breathing manoeuvres: 5% and 8% CO2 in air and hyperventilation targeting reductions of 5 and 10 mmHg compared to normocapnia. FupLim was determined by the break point of the autoregulation index (ARI) curve as a function of frequency when the phase response was gradually set to zero. The five breathing conditions led to highly significant differences in PETCO2 (p 
ISSN:0022-3751
1469-7793
DOI:10.1113/JP278710