Niche origin of mesenchymal stem cells derived microvesicles determines opposing effects on NSCLC: Primary versus metastatic

•Mesenchymal stem cells' (MSCs) microvesicles (MVs) alter NSCLC cells' phenotype.•Lung-MSCs' MVs promoted.•BM-MSCs' MVs suppressed NSCLC cells' cancerous phenotype.•The systemic nature of MVs marks them as attractive therapeutic markers/targets. Novel therapeutic approaches...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cellular signalling 2020-01, Vol.65, p.109456-109456, Article 109456
Hauptverfasser: Attar-Schneider, Oshrat, Dabbah, Mahmoud, Drucker, Liat, Gottfried, Maya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Mesenchymal stem cells' (MSCs) microvesicles (MVs) alter NSCLC cells' phenotype.•Lung-MSCs' MVs promoted.•BM-MSCs' MVs suppressed NSCLC cells' cancerous phenotype.•The systemic nature of MVs marks them as attractive therapeutic markers/targets. Novel therapeutic approaches that address the malignant cells in their stroma microenvironment are urgently needed in lung cancer. The stroma resident mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) interact with cancer cells in diverse ways including microvesicles (MVs) that transfer proteins and RNA species thereby modulating recipient cells' phenotype. Previously, we have demonstrated that MSCs' secretome from the primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) niche (lung) and metastatic niche (bone marrow (BM)) demonstrate opposite effects on NSCLC cells in a translation initiation (TI) dependent manner. Here, we examined the effect of MVs secreted from BM-MSCs' or lung-MSCs (healthy, NSCLC) to NSCLC phenotype. Briefly, NSCLC cell lines treated with Lung or BM-MSCs' MVs were assayed for viability (WST-1), cell count/death (trypan), migration (scratch), TI status and MAPKs activation (immunoblotting). Corresponding to previous published trends, Lung-MSCs' MVs promoted NSCLC cells' assayed traits whereas, BM-MSCs' MVs suppressed them. Activation of MAPKs and autophagy was registered in lung-MSCs MVs treated NSCLC cell lines only. Furthermore, lung-MSCs' MVs' treated NSCLC cells demonstrated an early (5min) activation of MAPKs and TI factors (peIF4E/peIF4GI) not evident in BM-MSCs MVs treated cells. These observations depict a role for MSCs'-MVs in NSCLC phenotype design and display distinct differences between the primary and metastatic niches that correspond to disease progression. In conclusion, the systemic nature of MVs marks them as attractive therapeutic markers/targets and we propose that identification of specific cargoes/signals that differentiate between MSCs MVs of primary and metastatic niches may introduce fresh therapeutic approaches.
ISSN:0898-6568
1873-3913
DOI:10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109456